When I finally got it, the sequence made more sense
Starting with the training and onboarding process, it felt a bit disjointed at first. Some steps came across as too technical without enough context, which left me guessing what was coming next. For example, early on I had to figure out the calling tools but I wasn’t introduced properly to the database feature until quite late in the step sequence. That delay caused a bit of confusion since I wasn’t sure how these integrated pieces fit together. However, once I was halfway through and got into the content about the automatic updates and how they impact workflows, things clicked. Suddenly, the onboarding steps aligned with what I was actually experiencing in the software. I realized the sequence was logical but maybe it could have used a little more connection between sections—linking why I needed to master one feature before moving on to another. Overall, the training definitely had its strengths, like the step-by-step demos and supportive resources, but in terms of arranging the order of tasks, I’d say it was a work in progress. If that is tweaked, the process will really improve and feel more intuitive for new users.